It’s quite common nowadays to talk about security leaks of mifare classic chips. It’s easy to “hack” the chip, clone it, read the contents of it without knowing the keys, and so on; the list goes on like this. Even the license holder NXP is recommending to migrate to mifare plus. Well not good for any product!
These words definitely don’t sound good, however there’s the fact that a huge number of mifare chips (more than one billion, according to unofficial sources of mine) are already being used for systems mainly transportation and access control. Many of these applications do not require anything more than reading a unique id. When it’s transportation or e-purse, it’s authenticating a few sectors and updating the purse balance.
Mifare was developed by an Austrian company called Micron. It was specifically designed for transportation and the name was chosen accordingly: Micron Fare Collection, which was Mi-Fare. The chip was very fast and providing a good level of security required for access control and transport ticketing environment. The memory structure is not flexible enough for today’s complex mechanisms but back then, I think it was more than enough.
Basically, mifare operating system has 16 sectors of secure memory protected by two 48 bit keys stored in the chip. Each sector has 4 blocks for storing data. Each block has 16 bytes of data storage. Each sector has one block reserved for keys and access conditions. Although not recommended, you can even use the keys as data storage.
I think the strength of mifare platform comes mainly from off-the-shelf readers and components widely available on the market. Today, designing a mifare application, developing it on readers and formatting the cards is quite a standardized process. You can find virtually unlimited number of products and companies providing mifare based application and systems. The “security” rules are also very well defined and documented.
Well, there’s been many projects that it was planned that mifare will be phased out. Or mifare is specifically blacklisted as a prerequisite. However, I strongly believe that mifare is quite a successful product and it has made a very good job for deploying contactless systems. If mifare did not exist, I think contactless systems would not be popular as it is today. Of course there are very strong competitors of mifare such as Legic, Calypso and Felica, but mifare is the most popular one among all. I will try to cover the competitors of mifare, which are all stronger than mifare in the security level, but not as much as deployed worldwide as mifare. This is actually the point that I’d like to point out with this post.
It’s quite common nowadays to talk about security leaks of mifare classic chips. It’s easy to “hack” the chip, clone it, read the contents of it without knowing the keys, and so on; the list goes on like this. Even the license holder NXP is recommending to migrate to mifare plus. Well not good for any product!
These words definitely don’t sound good, however there’s the fact that a huge number of mifare chips (more than one billion, according to unofficial sources of mine) are already being used for systems mainly transportation and access control. Many of these applications do not require anything more than reading a unique id. When it’s transportation or e-purse, it’s authenticating a few sectors and updating the purse balance.
Mifare was developed by an Austrian company called Micron. It was specifically designed for transportation and the name was chosen accordingly: Micron Fare Collection, which was Mi-Fare. The chip was very fast and providing a good level of security required for access control and transport ticketing environment. The memory structure is not flexible enough for today’s complex mechanisms but back then, I think it was more than enough.
Basically, mifare operating system has 16 sectors of secure memory protected by two 48 bit keys stored in the chip. Each sector has 4 blocks for storing data. Each block has 16 bytes of data storage. Each sector has one block reserved for keys and access conditions. Although not recommended, you can even use the keys as data storage.
I think the strength of mifare platform comes mainly from off-the-shelf readers and components widely available on the market. Today, designing a mifare application, developing it on readers and formatting the cards is quite a standardized process. You can find virtually unlimited number of products and companies providing mifare based application and systems. The “security” rules are also very well defined and documented.
Well, there’s been many projects that it was planned that mifare will be phased out. Or mifare is specifically blacklisted as a prerequisite. However, I strongly believe that mifare is quite a successful product and it has made a very good job for deploying contactless systems. If mifare did not exist, I think contactless systems would not be popular as it is today. Of course there are very strong competitors of mifare such as Legic, Calypso and Felica, but mifare is the most popular one among all. I will try to cover the competitors of mifare, which are all stronger than mifare in the security level, but not as much as deployed worldwide as mifare. This is actually the point that I’d like to point out with this post.